 |
 |
The CSI was designed to monitor cognitive status in healthy, at-risk, and afflicted populations. Although effective as a single-use screening tool to provide a "snapshot" of a client's cognitive profile, the CSI was designed primarily for use as a longitudinal measurement instrument. At its core is a series of repeatable neurocognitive tests that detect statistically significant, clinically meaningful change in central nervous system functioning. The CSI uses a series of short subtests that measure four empirically derived factors:
1. Attention/Working Memory
2. Spatial Memory/Learning
3. Response Speed
4. Processing Speed
The CSI norms were gathered to be useful in adults aged 18 to 90 across gender, race, and educational background.
Normative Sample Demographics
| |
Frequency |
Percent |
Age Group |
18-29 |
70 |
24.65 |
30-49 |
77 |
27.11 |
50-69 |
82 |
28.87 |
>= 70 |
55 |
19.37 |
Gender |
Female |
151 |
53.17 |
Male |
133 |
46.83 |
Ethnicity |
Caucasian |
209 |
73.59 |
African-American |
31 |
10.92 |
Hispanic |
9 |
3.17 |
Asian-American |
13 |
4.58 |
Other |
22 |
7.75 |
Education |
<= 12 years |
81 |
28.52 |
13-15 years |
98 |
34.21 |
>= 16 years |
105 |
36.97 |
Geographic Zone |
South |
79 |
27.82 |
North Central |
80 |
28.17 |
West |
56 |
19.72 |
Northeast |
69 |
24.30 |
Concurrent Validity
The CSI has been shown to be similar to face-to-face measures.
| |
CSI Factor |
Neuropsychological Measure |
Response Speed |
Processing Speed |
Memory |
Attention |
Response Speed Trail Making A Trail Making B |
0.73*** 0.74***
|
-0.19 -0.14
|
0.02 0.11
|
0.05 0.00
|
Processing Speed Symbol Digit Modalities Test Symbol Search |
0.58** 0.56**
|
0.58** 0.65**
|
0.30* 0.24
|
0.43* 0.39*
|
Memory Buschke SRT |
0.35*
|
0.18
|
0.52**
|
0.34*
|
Attention Digit Span |
0.31*
|
0.53**
|
0.19
|
0.62**
|
FSIQ (WASI) |
0.18 |
0.03 |
0.37* |
0.29 |
Effect sizes are denoted as: *moderate, **moderately large, ***large.
The CSI uses individually tailored statistics to determine if cognitive status
is improving, deteriorating, or remaining stable, and it has the advantage of greater
accuracy in measuring response time than face-to-face tests. Initial "snapshot"
cognitive profiles can be compared to a predicted score for healthy persons of similar
age, gender, race, and education. Multiple equivalent alternate forms have been
developed to afford simple, reliable, serial assessment of change, relative to the
initial evaluation.
Last updated: December 18, 2001
|